We got in touch with the two co-editors over at Leaf Garden Press to discuss the way the website as well as the people who run it function. Melanie Browne and Robert Henry, the two co-editors, also write in addition to running the literary journal. They each have had a substantial amount of work published and their website continues to flourish. No pun intended.

- – - – -

Five Fishes: Being a writer and an editor at the same time can be a pretty heavy load. What are the differences in pleasure that you get in having your own work published versus publishing the work of others?

Melanie Browne: I have a sense of pride in the stories and poems we publish. I think it’s a lot of fun to see their work come to life online. We try to pass on compliments we get on the work  along  to the writers. They earned it. We let them know.

As far as my own work, I have to work pretty hard. I get a lot of rejections also, along with some acceptances, and submitting can be a time-consuming process as well.

Robert Henry: Publishing the work of others seems like it matters a lot more than having my own work published. I’m not sure if this is because I don’t really write about anything, or because it’s a lot easier to be objective about other people’s art. The biggest difference is that I tend to still enjoy their work by the time we’ve published it in Leaf Garden. I think the actual process of writing is much more important than getting published, but once something is finished, what else is there to do with it besides eventually ship it off to someone’s inbox or set it on fire? (I do both.)

F.F.: Is there any sense of competition there?

M.B.: Not really. There are so many talented writers in the world. I enjoy writing  and I know others do too, for the same or different reasons.

F.F.: When and how did you start up your own literary journal?

R.H.: It was towards the end of 2008 when I became interested in publishing (again.) At the same time I remember watching this movie about a social experiment. This experiment was a record label that allowed the artists to have complete control over their music. I really liked that, and I thought I could apply it to literature. A friend and I designed a hand-bound collection, but he flaked on this project before distribution.

So, I started looking for someone to help me try again. I guess I’m obsessed with books but prone to false starts. A few months later, I remember e-mailing Melanie (a stranger at the time) a poem in response to one of her poems. We’ve been friends since, and then everything kind of started to fall into place with Leaf Garden.

F.F.: How does the co-editing process work? I mean, how do you two split up and share the responsibilities and duties that come along with the job?

M.B.: We both read and accept and reject. Robert is younger than I am, so he might be up at 2 am reading submissions. We work as one mind, which is unusual. We agree on almost everything. Occasionally he likes something I’m neutral on, or vice-versa, but we trust each other’s judgement.

R.H.:

We’re not very organized about splitting up the work. In general, we both handle submissions, often discussing them. Sometimes we “go rogue” and accept and reject on our own. We rarely disagree on things, though. This freedom as co-editors allows the journal to remain more eclectic, which is really important for me. Even if Melanie accepts work I’m not too keen on, it has my support. I know she has good tastes.

I handle all the technical junk like the website and the designing of the issues and books. Essentially, I’m the maintenance guy on top of being a co-editor.

F.F.: Do either of you ever want to fire the other? Be honest now.

R.H.: Hah. No. As much as I like publishing people’s work, the friendship with Melanie Browne is honestly the best part about co-editing the journal. If there’s a point where she needs to stop being co-editor, I’ll probably never find another co-editor that I get along with so well.

M.B.: Yes, or vice-versa, we get into tiffs now and again. I wouldn’t call them arguments, just misunderstandings. It can be a challenge to communicate everything online.

F.F.: What advice would you give to other writers about time management?

M.B.: Writing is hard work, and even if it isn’t how you earn a living, you are essentially working two jobs if you are a writer. Sometimes you just have to be lazy too. Watch VH1.

F.F.: If Robert Frost and William Carlos Williams both (somehow) submitted work to your journal and you were only able to publish one of the two, who would you choose?

M.B.: I guess  William Carlos Williams because I like chickens and wheelbarrows.

R.H.: I’d reject both. I don’t put up with ultimatums. So if you talk to them, tell them I said, “Nyeh.”

F.F.: Lastly, what inspired you to start writing in the first place?

M.B.: I originally kept a blog on Myspace, as a way to express myself. Then I was introduced to some poet friends, and I gave poetry a try.

R.H.: I wanted to start a revolution. Actually, I don’t know. There was no defining moment where I said, “Oh, I’m going to be a writer.” I never felt like I had an important purpose or story to tell. I just started writing very young. I was/am the type of kid that just sang/sings random words, and it seemed like these things should be on paper. I think instead of imaginary friends, I had pieces of paper. I remember the first time I read Hatchet by Gary Paulsen when people ask me this question. It was the first book I read that really blew my mind with some of its implications about being a human being. I think this book led to my first attempts at writing fiction. I was an impressionable ten-year-old boy, but I’m still in love with that book. It used to seem important to leave behind some kind of legacy. Maybe that’s it?

- – - – -

Five Fishes wants to gratefully thank both Melanie Browne and Robert Henry for doing this interview. I really enjoyed asking these two fine folks about their passions, and I admit that I giggled at some of their responses. A good insight into the lives of both editors and writers, right? Right. Be sure to check out Leaf Garden Press when you get the chance, too.

- C.J.

Nin Andrews on MFA Poetry

February 22, 2010

Check this out. And check out our interview with Nin while you’re here.

- C.J.

Sherry Fairchok’s The Palace of Ashes is a collection of poems laden with coal, ash, and horses.
Yes, I know that’s an odd mix – but you need to read this book in order to understand.
Having never lived in a coal-mining town, I hadn’t the slightest idea what it was like. Not one bit. After reading The Palace of Ashes, I feel as though I’ve spent my whole life inhaling dust and cleaing it off of the front patio every evening.

Fairchok’s tone in her poems is relatively hard to pin down, but it is enjoyable. It is real. It is the voice of someone who honestly wants to deliver a childhood vision. This book engulfs the reader into Fairchok’s world, one of hard work and honest living. It is a pleasant place to stay.

Youth in Revolt

Awkward is as awkward does. Michael Cera plays yet another teen with angst and sexual problems in Youth in Revolt. Nick Twisp (Cera) meets the love of his life, Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday) in a trailer park while on a trip with his dysfunctional mother (Jean Smart). Mick and Sheeni woo each other in typical high-school-fashion until Nick leaves with his mother; which is when they decide the only way to be together is for Nick to be thrown out. This is when Nick introduces us to Francois Dillinger, his alter-ego, whose sole purpose is to help Nick act more in impulse. A series of escalating dastardly deeds sends Nick packing to live with his father, who now lives in Sheeni’s trailer park. Unfortunately Nick is a wanted man for causing a million-dollar fire and Sheeni is sent away to boarding school. After trying to get her back from the boarding school, and succeeding, the movie climaxes with Nick and Sheeni sharing an intimate moment before he is dragged off to juvenile detention.

Youth in Revolt is the same kind of funny that Superbad was, except it’s missing the fat repulsive one for comic relief. The only thing Youth has going for it is the narration. Since Nick is an aspiring novelist, and a reader of American prose, the narration is silly and witty; at least for an English buff. The direction follows suit with some brilliant literary scenes, my personal favorite is the slow motion shower with an overture of epiphany music. Unfortunately the movie is dragged heavily by its constant sexual repression and Cera’s bumbling demeanor. Michael Cera can only play 16 for so long before his performances turn from creepy, to pedophile creepy.

Youth in Revolt: (2 ½ out of 5)

- Steve

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel

Next to Alvin’s “A” on his shirt there should be a flat symbol not because the little furry fiend can’t carry a tune, but because it would describe his character perfectly.  Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel is an unnecessary sequel to the popular children’s movie Alvin and the Chipmunks. The Squeakquel picks up right where the last movie left us; the boys rocking out on stage to a shrill version of You Really Got Me Now while Dave (Jason Lee) screamed stage instructions at the stage-whore Alvin (voiced by Justin Long, Live Free or Die Hard). Alvin, continuing to ignore Dave, jumps high into the rafters, and accidentally lets a giant guitar loose and puts Dave in the hospital. Then, in another obvious turn of events, the chipmunks’ aunt, charged with watching them in Dave’s absence, gets hospitalized herself, and her loner son, Toby (Zachary Levi), has to take care of the boys. The chipmunks are immediately enrolled into school so they can lead somewhat normal lives, meanwhile a group of female chipmunks who can also sing, figure that, land on the doorstep of Alvin’s old manager and nemesis Ian Hawk (David Cross, Arrested Development). The group of girls, named The Chippetts, are pitted against the boys as Alvin grows farther from his brothers (Simon voiced by and Theodore voiced by Jesse McCartney). The movie ends the same way the last one does, with a trio of chipmunks escaping a cage while Ian Hawk is distracted by his own upcoming fame.

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel is a painfully obvious trope of high school cliché movie plots and characters. The actors are reading at best, with the exception of David Cross and Zachary Levi who bring the only funny moments. Watch a low rate high school movie, replace the new kids with singing chipmunks, add overly dramatized covers of half-rate songs, and you have The Squeakuel. The problem is that it’s not even a modern high school movie, where the main characters come in second but learn a valuable lesson, but a 90’s high school movie with way too much happy ending. It may have a lot of movement and color, but so does The Princess and the Frog, which is much more highly recommended than the fab furries.

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel (1 ½ out of 5)

- Steve